Safety of Clopidogrel vs. Ticagrelor in Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Regimens for High-Bleeding Risk Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis of Adverse Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Patients of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) at a high-bleeding risk (HBR) often require dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) to reduce the risk of recurrent cardiovascular events. Clopidogrel and ticagrelor are the most commonly used antiplatelet agents in DAPT regimens. However, the safety profiles of these drugs in ACS patients at HBR remain a subject of ongoing debate. AIM: To investigate any difference between the safety of clopidogrel and ticagrelor used as a part of DAPT regimen in ACS patients at HBR. METHODS: A systematic search on PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was conducted to identify experimental and observational studies published up to the knowledge cutoff date in September 2023. Studies comparing the safety of clopidogrel and ticagrelor in ACS patients at HBR were included for analysis. The primary outcomes assessed were major bleeding events, stroke, and myocardial infarction (MI), while secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), and net adverse clinical and cerebral events (NACCE). RESULTS: We included a total of 8 observational studies in our meta-analysis. The pooled analysis revealed a statistically significant increase in the risk of MI (pooled RR = 1.43; 95% CI 1.12-1.83; P = 0.005) in the patients using clopidogrel. There were no statistically significant differences in major bleeding events (pooled RR = 0.94; 95% CI 0.82-1.09; P = 0.44), stroke (pooled RR = 1.36; 95% CI 0.86-2.14; P = 0.18), all-cause mortality (pooled RR = 1.17; 95% CI 0.97-1.41; P = 0.10), MACCE (pooled RR = 1.07; 95% CI 0.76-1.50; P = 0.69) and NACCE (pooled RR = 0.95; 95% CI 0.66-1.37; P = 0.78) between the two groups. Subgroup analyses based on region were performed. CONCLUSION: Both drugs are generally safe for treating ACS patients with HBR at baseline, although a higher risk of MI was observed with the use of clopidogrel. Nevertheless, drug choice should factor in regional variations, patient-specific characteristics, cost, accessibility, and potential drug interactions.

Impact of perioperative low-molecular-weight heparin therapy on clinical events of elderly patients with prior coronary stents implanted > 12 months undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the safety and efficacy of discontinuing antiplatelet therapy via LMWH bridging therapy in elderly patients with coronary stents implanted for > 12 months undergoing non-cardiac surgery. This randomized trial was designed to compare the clinical benefits and risks of antiplatelet drug discontinuation via LMWH bridging therapy. METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive subcutaneous injections of either dalteparin sodium or placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was cardiac or cerebrovascular events. The primary safety endpoint was major bleeding. RESULTS: Among 2476 randomized patients, the variables (sex, age, body mass index, comorbidities, medications, and procedural characteristics) and percutaneous coronary intervention information were not significantly different between the bridging and non-bridging groups. During the follow-up period, the rate of the combined endpoint in the bridging group was significantly lower than in the non-bridging group (5.79% vs. 8.42%, p = 0.012). The incidence of myocardial injury in the bridging group was significantly lower than in the non-bridging group (3.14% vs. 5.19%, p = 0.011). Deep vein thrombosis occurred more frequently in the non-bridging group (1.21% vs. 0.4%, p = 0.024), and there was a trend toward a higher rate of pulmonary embolism (0.32% vs. 0.08%, p = 0.177). There was no significant difference between the groups in the rates of acute myocardial infarction (0.81% vs. 1.38%), cardiac death (0.24% vs. 0.41%), stroke (0.16% vs. 0.24%), or major bleeding (1.22% vs. 1.45%). Multivariable analysis showed that LMWH bridging, creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min, preoperative hemoglobin < 10 g/dL, and diabetes mellitus were independent predictors of ischemic events. LMWH bridging and a preoperative platelet count of < 70 × 109/L were independent predictors of minor bleeding events. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed the safety and efficacy of perioperative LMWH bridging therapy in elderly patients with coronary stents implanted > 12 months undergoing non-cardiac surgery. An alternative approach might be the use of bridging therapy with half-dose LMWH. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN65203415.

Safety and complications of continuation of aspirin therapy in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic simple prostatectomy.

To evaluate the safety and feasibility of continued perioperative aspirin at the time of robotic assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP). We performed a retrospective review of our IRB approved institutional database of patients who underwent RASP between 2013 and 2022. Comparative groups included patients taking aspirin in the perioperative period and those not taking aspirin pre-operatively. The primary outcome was any post-operative bleeding related complication using the modified Clavien-Dindo classification. Secondary outcomes included the identification of risk factors for increased blood loss in the entire study population, operative time, and blood transfusion requirement. 143 patients underwent RASP of which 55 (38.5%) patients continued perioperative aspirin therapy and 88 (61.5%) patients did not. Baseline demographics were similar between groups. Patients taking perioperative aspirin had a higher rate of hypertension (74.5% vs 58.0%, p = 0.04) and other cardiovascular disease (30.9% vs 11.4%, p = 0.007). Postoperative complications were similar between the groups (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3; p = 0.43). Median blood loss (150 cc vs 150 cc, p = 0.38), percentage drop in hemoglobin (13.4 vs 13.2, p = 0.94) and blood transfusion rate (3.6 vs 1.1, p = 0.56) were also similar between groups. The median blood loss was 150 ml for the whole study population. On regression analysis, neither aspirin nor any other variable was associated with increased blood loss (> 150 ml). Aspirin can be safely continued perioperatively in patients undergoing RASP without any risk of bleeding related complications, blood loss, or increased transfusion rate.

Limb Outcomes With Ticagrelor Plus Aspirin in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus and Atherosclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Ticagrelor reduced major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and increased bleeding in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and coronary artery disease. Limb events including revascularization, acute limb ischemia (ALI), and amputation are major morbidities in patients with T2DM and atherosclerosis. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the effect of ticagrelor on limb events. METHODS: Patients were randomized to ticagrelor or placebo on top of aspirin and followed for a median of 3 years. MACE (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke), limb events (ALI, amputation, revascularization), and bleeding were adjudicated by an independent and blinded clinical events committee. The presence of peripheral artery disease (PAD) was reported at baseline. RESULTS: Of 19,220 patients randomized, 1,687 (8.8%) had PAD at baseline. In patients receiving placebo, PAD was associated with higher MACE (10.7% vs 7.3%; HR: 1.48; P < 0.001) and limb (9.5% vs 0.8%; HR: 10.67; P < 0.001) risk. Ticagrelor reduced limb events (1.6% vs 1.3%; HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.61-0.96; P = 0.022) with significant reductions for revascularization (HR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.62-0.99; P = 0.044) and ALI (HR: 0.24; 95% CI: 0.08-0.70; P = 0.009). The benefit was consistent with or without PAD (HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.58-1.11; and HR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.55-1.05, respectively; Pinteraction = 0.81). There was no effect modification of ticagrelor vs placebo based on PAD for MACE (Pinteraction = 0.40) or TIMI major bleeding (Pinteraction = 0.3239). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with T2DM and atherosclerosis are at high risk of limb events. Ticagrelor decreased this risk, but increased bleeding. Future trials evaluating the combination of ticagrelor and aspirin would further elucidate the benefit/risk of such therapy in patients with PAD, including those without coronary artery disease. (A Study Comparing Cardiovascular Effects of Ticagrelor Versus Placebo in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [THEMIS]: NCT01991795).

Optimal antithrombotic strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation beyond 1 year after drug-eluting stent implantation: Design and rationale of the randomized ADAPT AF-DES trial.

BACKGROUND: Both anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapies are recommended after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Although contemporary guidelines recommend discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy 1 year after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation due to excessive bleeding risk, supporting randomized trials are still lacking. METHODS: The ADAPT AF-DES trial is a multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized, non-inferiority trial, enrolling 960 patients with AF with a CHA2DS2-VASc score > 1, who underwent PCI with DES implantation at least 12 months before enrollment. Eligible patients are randomly assigned to receive either non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) monotherapy or NOAC plus clopidogrel combination therapy. The primary outcome is net adverse clinical event (NACE) at 1 year after randomization, defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, systemic embolism, and major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding, as defined by the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis criteria. We hypothesize that NOAC monotherapy would be non-inferior to NOAC plus clopidogrel combination therapy for NACE in patients with AF beyond 12 months after DES implantation. CONCLUSIONS: The ADAPT AF-DES trial will evaluate the efficacy and safety of NOAC monotherapy versus NOAC plus clopidogrel combination therapy in patients with AF beyond 12 months after PCI with DES implantation. The ADAPT AF-DES trial will provide robust evidence for an optimal antithrombotic strategy in patients with AF after DES implantation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov. Unique identifier: NCT04250116.

Tratamiento antiagregante plaquetario oral para el ictus isquémico agudo: una revisión Cochrane / Oral antiplatelet therapy for acute ischaemic stroke: a Cochrane review

Pregunta de la revisión. Queríamos comparar la seguridad y la eficacia del tratamiento antiplaquetario oral frente a placebo o ningún tratamiento en personas con ictus isquémico agudo para ver si los antiplaquetarios orales reducían el número de muertes y mejoraban los resultados a largo plazo en los supervivientes. Fundamento. La mayoría de los ictus están causados por una obstrucción repentina de una arteria del cerebro que suele deberse a un coágulo de sangre (lo que se denomina ictus isquémico). El tratamiento inmediato con antiagregantes plaquetarios, como la aspirina, puede evitar la formación de nuevos coágulos y mejorar así la recuperación tras el ictus. Sin embargo, los antiagregantes plaquetarios también pueden provocar hemorragias cerebrales, lo que podría anular sus efectos beneficiosos. Características del estudio. Se identificaron 11 estudios, hasta agosto de 2020, para su inclusión en la revisión. Estos estudios incluyeron 42.226 participantes. Tres eran nuevos ensayos desde la última actualización. Como en la versión anterior de esta revisión, dos estudios aportaron el 96% de los datos. La mayoría de los participantes en la revisión eran ancianos, con una proporción significativa de más de 70 años. Los hombres y las mujeres estaban representados casi por igual en los ensayos. Parecía haber alguna variación en la gravedad del accidente cerebrovascular entre los ensayos incluidos. La duración programada del tratamiento varió de 5 días a 3 meses y el periodo de seguimiento programado varió de 10 días a 6 meses. Resultados clave. La aspirina, en dosis de 160 mg a 300 mg diarios, iniciada en las 48 horas siguientes a la aparición de los síntomas del ictus, salvó vidas y redujo el riesgo de que se produjera un nuevo ictus en las dos primeras semanas... (AU)

Tratamiento crónico ambulatorio con sevoflurano tópico en pacientes con úlceras vasculares / Chronic outpatient treatment with topical sevoflurane in patients with vascular ulcers

Objetivo mostrar la efectividad y seguridad del sevoflurano tópico tras la administración ambulatoria y prolongada en los pacientes con úlceras vasculares refractarias. Métodos estudio observacional retrospectivo de pacientes con úlceras vasculares dolorosas refractarias a terapias habituales y que fueron tratados con sevoflurano tópico durante al menos 36 meses. Se recogieron las variables: edad, sexo, antecedentes médicos, comorbilidad asociada, etiología de úlcera y tratamiento médico. Se analizó la mejoría clínica y la variación de la superficie de las úlceras vasculares. Para cuantificar la intensidad del dolor basal e irruptivo antes y después del tratamiento se utilizó la escala visual analógica. Resultados del total de pacientes tratados, 9 cumplían los criterios de inclusión. La edad media fue de 74,8 ± 7,5 años. Los casos 2 y 9 fallecieron durante el seguimiento. La acción analgésica del sevoflurano tópico fue rápida (3,1 ± 2,1 min), intensa (escala visual analógica: 7 ± 1,1 a 1,4 ± 1,1 puntos) y duradera (de 6 a 24 h). Salvo el caso 4, todos experimentaron una reducción de la superficie (15,1 ± 5,0 a 2,7 ± 4,2) de las úlceras vasculares y no se observó tolerancia a lo largo del tiempo. Conclusión la aplicación de sevoflurano tópico es una estrategia analgésica y reepitelizante para las úlceras vasculares que presenta un perfil correcto de seguridad (AU)

Objective To show the effectiveness and safety of topical sevoflurane after ambulatory and prolonged administration in patients with refractory vascular ulcers. Methods Retrospective observational study analyzing clinical improvement and vascular ulcers surface area variation after topical application of sevoflurane. Inclusion criteria were patients with painful vascular ulcers refractory to usual therapies and who were treated with topical sevoflurane for at least 36 months. The following variables were collected: age, sex, medical history, associated comorbidity, ulcer etiology and medical treatment. The visual analog scale was used to measure baseline and break through pain intensity before and after treatment. Results Nine patients met the inclusion criteria of the total number of patients treated whose median age was 74.8 ± 7.5 years. Cases 2 and 9 died during follow-up. In all cases, the analgesic action of topical sevoflurane was rapid (3.1 ± 2.1 minutes), intense (visual analog scale: 7 ± 1.1 to 1.4 ± 1.1 points) and long-lasting (6 to 24 h). With the exception of case 4, all patients experienced a large reduction in vascular ulcers surface area (15.1 ± 5.0 a 2.7 ± 4.2) and tolerance was not observed over time. Conclusion Topical application of sevoflurane is an analgesic and re-epithelializing strategy for vascular ulcers with a successful safety profile (AU)

Tratamiento antiagregante plaquetario oral para el ictus isquémico agudo: una revisión Cochrane / Oral antiplatelet therapy for acute ischaemic stroke: a Cochrane review

Pregunta de la revisión. Queríamos comparar la seguridad y la eficacia del tratamiento antiplaquetario oral frente a placebo o ningún tratamiento en personas con ictus isquémico agudo para ver si los antiplaquetarios orales reducían el número de muertes y mejoraban los resultados a largo plazo en los supervivientes. Fundamento. La mayoría de los ictus están causados por una obstrucción repentina de una arteria del cerebro que suele deberse a un coágulo de sangre (lo que se denomina ictus isquémico). El tratamiento inmediato con antiagregantes plaquetarios, como la aspirina, puede evitar la formación de nuevos coágulos y mejorar así la recuperación tras el ictus. Sin embargo, los antiagregantes plaquetarios también pueden provocar hemorragias cerebrales, lo que podría anular sus efectos beneficiosos. Características del estudio. Se identificaron 11 estudios, hasta agosto de 2020, para su inclusión en la revisión. Estos estudios incluyeron 42.226 participantes. Tres eran nuevos ensayos desde la última actualización. Como en la versión anterior de esta revisión, dos estudios aportaron el 96% de los datos. La mayoría de los participantes en la revisión eran ancianos, con una proporción significativa de más de 70 años. Los hombres y las mujeres estaban representados casi por igual en los ensayos. Parecía haber alguna variación en la gravedad del accidente cerebrovascular entre los ensayos incluidos. La duración programada del tratamiento varió de 5 días a 3 meses y el periodo de seguimiento programado varió de 10 días a 6 meses. Resultados clave. La aspirina, en dosis de 160 mg a 300 mg diarios, iniciada en las 48 horas siguientes a la aparición de los síntomas del ictus, salvó vidas y redujo el riesgo de que se produjera un nuevo ictus en las dos primeras semanas... (AU)

Dual Antiplatelet Treatment up to 72 Hours after Ischemic Stroke.

BACKGROUND: Dual antiplatelet treatment has been shown to lower the risk of recurrent stroke as compared with aspirin alone when treatment is initiated early (≤24 hours) after an acute mild stroke. The effect of clopidogrel plus aspirin as compared with aspirin alone administered within 72 hours after the onset of acute cerebral ischemia from atherosclerosis has not been well studied. METHODS: In 222 hospitals in China, we conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, two-by-two factorial trial involving patients with mild ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA) of presumed atherosclerotic cause who had not undergone thrombolysis or thrombectomy. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, within 72 hours after symptom onset to receive clopidogrel (300 mg on day 1 and 75 mg daily on days 2 to 90) plus aspirin (100 to 300 mg on day 1 and 100 mg daily on days 2 to 21) or matching clopidogrel placebo plus aspirin (100 to 300 mg on day 1 and 100 mg daily on days 2 to 90). There was no interaction between this component of the factorial trial design and a second part that compared immediate with delayed statin treatment (not reported here). The primary efficacy outcome was new stroke, and the primary safety outcome was moderate-to-severe bleeding - both assessed within 90 days. RESULTS: A total of 6100 patients were enrolled, with 3050 assigned to each trial group. TIA was the qualifying event for enrollment in 13.1% of the patients. A total of 12.8% of the patients were assigned to a treatment group no more than 24 hours after stroke onset, and 87.2% were assigned after 24 hours and no more than 72 hours after stroke onset. A new stroke occurred in 222 patients (7.3%) in the clopidogrel-aspirin group and in 279 (9.2%) in the aspirin group (hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.94; P = 0.008). Moderate-to-severe bleeding occurred in 27 patients (0.9%) in the clopidogrel-aspirin group and in 13 (0.4%) in the aspirin group (hazard ratio, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.07 to 4.04; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with mild ischemic stroke or high-risk TIA of presumed atherosclerotic cause, combined clopidogrel-aspirin therapy initiated within 72 hours after stroke onset led to a lower risk of new stroke at 90 days than aspirin therapy alone but was associated with a low but higher risk of moderate-to-severe bleeding. (Funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China and others; INSPIRES ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03635749.).

Antiagregantes plaquetarios y cirugía oral: retirar o no retirar, esa es la cuestión / Antiplatelet therapy and oral surgery: to discontinue or not, that is the question

Las enfermedades cardiovasculares constituyen una de las patologías sistémicas más prevalentes en el mundo occidental. Muchos pacientes cardiópatas han tenido un episodio coronario agudo y están siendo tratados con antiagregantes plaquetarios. La terapia con estos fármacos puede suponer un reto para el odontólogo, que debe enfrentarse a un importante dilema: o mantener el fárma co, con el consiguiente riesgo hemorrági co, o retirarlo, con la posibilidad de que se produzcan complicaciones tromboembólicas, suponiendo un riesgo para la vida del paciente. Por ello, los odontólogos deberíamos conocer cuál debe ser el manejo de este tipo de pacientes ante la perspectiva de realizar un procedimiento quirúrgico en la cavidad oral o incluso una simple extracción dentaria. Los objetivos de esta revisión narrativa son, en primer lugar, recordar la fisiología plaquetaria y los mecanismos de forma ción del trombo plaquetario; en segundo lugar, profundizar en los mecanismos de acción de los diferentes fármacos antia gregantes plaquetarios; y, en tercer lugar, ya que no existen guías clínicas al res pecto, realizar un abordaje crítico de las pautas existentes para el manejo odonto lógico de este tipo de pacientes, en aras de prevenir la aparición de posibles com plicaciones, no solo locales, sino, lo que es más importante, complicaciones sisté micas. En estos casos, antes de retirar la terapia antiagregante, convendría sope sar el riesgo hemorrágico versus el riesgo de generar un nuevo episodio tromboem bólico, como puede ser la trombosis dstent o la recidiva del accidente coronario agudo, eventos que podrían poner en riesgo la vida del paciente (AU)

Cardiovascular disease is one of the most prevalent systemic pathologies worldwide; those patients usually have had an acute coronary event which is treated with antiplatelet therapy. These drugs represent a challenge for the dentist, who must face a major dilemma: either maintain the drug, with the consequent bleeding risk, or withdraw it, with the possibility of thromboembolic complications, entailing a risk to the patient’s life. Therefore, dentists should know how to manage patients treated with these drugs when performing a surgical procedure or even a simple tooth extraction. The objectives of this narrative review are, firstly, to recall platelet physiology and the mechanisms of platelet thrombus formation; secondly, to go more deeply into the mechanisms of action of the different antiplatelet drugs; and thirdly, since there are no clinical guidelines on this topic, to critically review the existing guidelines related to the dental management, in order to prevent the appearance of possible complications, not only local, but more importantly, systemic complications. In these cases, before interrupting antiplatelet therapy,the risk of bleeding should be evaluated against the risk of generating a new thromboembolic episode, such as stent thrombosis or recurrence of the acute coronary accident, events that could put the patient’s life at risk (AU)

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy vs Alteplase for Patients With Minor Nondisabling Acute Ischemic Stroke: The ARAMIS Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Intravenous thrombolysis is increasingly used in patients with minor stroke, but its benefit in patients with minor nondisabling stroke is unknown. Objective: To investigate whether dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is noninferior to intravenous thrombolysis among patients with minor nondisabling acute ischemic stroke. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, open-label, blinded end point, noninferiority randomized clinical trial included 760 patients with acute minor nondisabling stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score ≤5, with ≤1 point on the NIHSS in several key single-item scores; scale range, 0-42). The trial was conducted at 38 hospitals in China from October 2018 through April 2022. The final follow-up was on July 18, 2022. Interventions: Eligible patients were randomized within 4.5 hours of symptom onset to the DAPT group (n = 393), who received 300 mg of clopidogrel on the first day followed by 75 mg daily for 12 (±2) days, 100 mg of aspirin on the first day followed by 100 mg daily for 12 (±2) days, and guideline-based antiplatelet treatment until 90 days, or the alteplase group (n = 367), who received intravenous alteplase (0.9 mg/kg; maximum dose, 90 mg) followed by guideline-based antiplatelet treatment beginning 24 hours after receipt of alteplase. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was excellent functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 or 1 (range, 0-6), at 90 days. The noninferiority of DAPT to alteplase was defined on the basis of a lower boundary of the 1-sided 97.5% CI of the risk difference greater than or equal to -4.5% (noninferiority margin) based on a full analysis set, which included all randomized participants with at least 1 efficacy evaluation, regardless of treatment group. The 90-day end points were assessed in a blinded manner. A safety end point was symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage up to 90 days. Results: Among 760 eligible randomized patients (median [IQR] age, 64 [57-71] years; 223 [31.0%] women; median [IQR] NIHSS score, 2 [1-3]), 719 (94.6%) completed the trial. At 90 days, 93.8% of patients (346/369) in the DAPT group and 91.4% (320/350) in the alteplase group had an excellent functional outcome (risk difference, 2.3% [95% CI, -1.5% to 6.2%]; crude relative risk, 1.38 [95% CI, 0.81-2.32]). The unadjusted lower limit of the 1-sided 97.5% CI was -1.5%, which is larger than the -4.5% noninferiority margin (P for noninferiority <.001). Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage at 90 days occurred in 1 of 371 participants (0.3%) in the DAPT group and 3 of 351 (0.9%) in the alteplase group. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with minor nondisabling acute ischemic stroke presenting within 4.5 hours of symptom onset, DAPT was noninferior to intravenous alteplase with regard to excellent functional outcome at 90 days. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03661411.

Association Between CYP2B6 Polymorphisms and Efficacy of Clopidogrel in Minor Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack.

BACKGROUND: CYP2B6 (cytochrome P450 subfamily IIB polypeptide 6), encoded by the CYP2B6 gene, is a critical enzyme involved in clopidogrel metabolism. However, the association between CYP2B6 polymorphisms and the efficacy of clopidogrel in minor stroke or transient ischemic attack for secondary stroke prevention remains unclear. METHODS: Based on CHANCE (Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients With Acute Nondisabling Cerebrovascular Events) randomized clinical trial of aspirin plus clopidogrel versus aspirin alone, we investigated the role of CYP2B6 polymorphisms and the efficacy of clopidogrel in patients with minor stroke or transient ischemic attack in China from October 2009 to July 2012. A total of 2853 patients were successfully genotyped for CYP2B6-516G>T, rs3745274 and CYP2B6-1456 T>C, rs2054675. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were new stroke and any bleeding within 90 days. RESULTS: Among the 2853 patients, 32.8% were identified as the carriers of the CYP2B6-516 GT/TT or -1456 TC/CC genotype. The incidences of 90-day new stroke in aspirin plus clopidogrel and aspirin alone groups were 7.1% versus 11.3% among noncarriers, respectively; and 9.7% versus 12.2% among carriers, respectively. The efficacy of aspirin plus clopidogrel versus aspirin alone was not significantly different (P interaction=0.29) in noncarriers (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.45-0.83]) compared to carriers (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.54-1.18]). The incidence (n=51) of 90-day any bleeding in aspirin plus clopidogrel and aspirin alone groups were 2.2% (21 bleeds) versus 1.9% (18 bleeds) among noncarriers (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.59-2.09]) and 1.9% (9 bleeds) versus 0.7% (3 bleeds) among carriers (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.23 [95% CI, 0.86-12.12]). Similar findings were observed during the 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In this post hoc analysis of the CHANCE trial, we did not observe a significant difference in the efficacy of aspirin plus clopidogrel compared with aspirin in carriers versus noncarriers of CYP2B6-516 GT/TT or -1456 TC/CC genotype. Our results suggest that both carriers and noncarriers suffering from a minor stroke are likely to benefit from aspirin plus clopidogrel treatment over aspirin monotherapy for secondary prevention. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT00979589.

Implementation of CYP2C19 genotyping and clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention in East Asian patients treated with oral P2Y12 inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: The CYP2C19 loss-of-function variants have significant impact on response to clopidogrel. The efficacy and safety of tailored antiplatelet therapy under the guidance of CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms remains elusive for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). OBJECTIVES: The aims of the present study were to investigate the impact of clinical implementation of CYP2C19 genotyping on the selection of oral P2Y12 inhibitor therapy following PCI, and to estimate the risk of adverse outcomes for patients with different genotype status treated with alternative or traditional P2Y12 inhibitor. METHODS: Data from a single-center registry enrolling 41,090 consecutive PCI patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI were analyzed. Risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and bleeding events within 12 months after PCI were compared across CYP2C19 genotype and antiplatelet therapy groups using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: CYP2C19 genotyping was successfully achieved for 9081 patients, of whom baseline characteristics significantly differed from non-genotyped patients. A higher proportion of genotyped patients were prescribed ticagrelor compared with non-genotyped patients (27.0 % vs. 15.5 %, P < 0.001). CYP2C19 metabolic status was an independent predictor for use of ticagrelor (P < 0.001). Ticagrelor was significantly associated with a lower risk of MACEs in poor metabolizers (adjusted hazard ratio 0.62, 95 % confidence interval 0.42 to 0.92, P = 0.017), but not in intermediate metabolizers or normal metabolizers. The interaction was not statistically significant (P for interaction = 0.252). CONCLUSIONS: Genotype information on CYP2C19 metabolic status was associated with an increase in the use of potent antiplatelet therapy in PCI patients. Patients prescribed with clopidogrel has a higher risk of MACEs among poor metabolizers, which suggested the potential application of genotype-guided P2Y12 inhibitor selection for improving clinical outcomes.

A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Eptifibatide Bolus Only Versus Bolus Plus Infusion In Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention For ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUNDS: The use of eptifibatide combined with heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is recommended to be followed by continuous infusion. Recently, there are some suggestions that using bolus only may be sufficient and cost-effective but randomized trials are lacking. AIMS: The goal of this study was to evaluate these two approaches in a double-blinded randomized control trial. METHODS: The primary PCI patients who received bolus eptifibatide were randomized to 75 mg IV eptifibatide infusion or placebo blindly. The patients were followed up for the primary outcome of vascular or bleeding complications and secondary outcome of ischemic complications. RESULTS: 330 patients (165 from each group) completed the study. The mean age was 57.67 ± 11.53 years and 77.3 % were male. Major bleeding was seen in 1 patient in each group. Hematoma occurred in 8.5 %. The relative risk of hematoma and ecchymosis in bolus plus infusion group to bolus only group were 0.988 (95 % CI: 0.486-2.006) and 1.032 (95 % CI: 0.729-1.459). Multivariate analysis confirmed no significant differences in the bleeding event. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in in-hospital death or any ischemic events. (Cath lab death: 1.4 % in bolus only vs zero % in the control group, p = 0.217, stent thrombosis was seen in one patient in each group). CONCLUSION: There were no differences in the risk of access site ecchymosis, hematoma or major bleeding. Ischemic events and stent thrombosis rates were also similar. Our study suggests that using eptifibatide bolus only during PCI of patients with STEMI is safe and can be cost-saving.

Sangramiento posextracción dentaria y medidas para su control en pacientes tratados con antiagregantes plaquetarios / Bleeding after tooth extraction and measures for its control in patients treated with antiplatelet agents

Introducción: El desarrollo de las ciencias médicas trae consigo un incremento en la expectativa de vida, junto a la detección temprana de un gran número de enfermedades crónicas como las cerebrovasculares y cardiovasculares, que son tratadas rutinariamente con medicamentos antiagregantes plaquetarios. El conocimiento del manejo de estos pacientes ante los procedimientos quirúrgicos estomatológicos constituye un reto en la práctica diaria profesional. Objetivo: Determinar el nivel de sangramiento posextracción dentaria en pacientes con enfermedad cardiovascular y cerebrovascular, según el tipo de antiagregantes plaquetarios y grupo dentario, así como la frecuencia de utilización de las medidas para su control. Métodos: Se efectuó un estudio observacional, descriptivo, longitudinal y prospectivo con un universo de 136 pacientes de más de 20 años, remitidos por su cardiólogo y que necesitaban realizarse extracciones dentarias sin modificar su tratamiento con antiagregantes plaquetarios. Las variables estudiadas fueron la enfermedad sistémica, el tipo de antiagregante plaquetario, el nivel de sangramiento, grupo dentario intervenido y método hemostático utilizado. Resultados: La mitad de los pacientes estudiados no presentó sangramiento posextracción dentaria. En los pacientes tratados con aspirina o clopidogrel predominaron los sujetos sin sangramiento para un 84,3 por ciento y 62,5 por ciento, respectivamente. En los de doble antiagregación prevaleció el sangramiento moderado con un 46,3 por ciento. Los grupos dentarios incisivo, canino y premolar no presentaron episodios de sangramiento para un 64,1 por ciento, 51,6 por ciento y 53,3por ciento, respectivamente. El método hemostático más utilizado fue la compresión de las corticales y termoterapia fría (47,8 por ciento). Conclusiones: La mitad de los pacientes con enfermedades cardiovasculares y cerebrovasculares no presentaron sangramiento posextracción dentaria(AU)

Introduction: The development of medical sciences brings with it an increase in life expectancy, together with the early detection of a large number of chronic diseases such as cerebrovascular and cardiovascular diseases, which are routinely treated with antiplatelet aggregation drugs. Knowledge on the treatment of these patients before stomatological surgical procedures constitutes a challenge in daily professional practice. Objective: To determine the level of bleeding after tooth extraction in patients with cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease, according to the type of antiplatelet agents and dental group, as well as the frequency of use of measures for their control. Methods: An observational, descriptive, longitudinal and prospective study was carried out with a universe of 136 patients over 20 years of age, referred by their cardiologist, who needed dental extractions without modifying their treatment with antiplatelet agents. The variables studied were systemic disease, type of antiplatelet agent, level of bleeding, dental group treated and hemostatic method used. Results: Half of the patients studied did not present bleeding after tooth extraction. In patients treated with aspirin or clopidogrel, 84.3 percent and 62.5por ciento, respectively, had no bleeding. In those with double antiplatelet therapy, modera te bleeding prevailed with 46.3 The incisor, canine and premolar tooth groups did not present bleeding episodes (64.1 percent, 51.6and 53.3 percent respectively). The most commonly used hemostatic method was cortical compression and cold thermotherapy (47.8%). Conclusions: Half of the patients with cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases did not present bleeding after tooth extraction(AU)